The republicans seriously posted this unironically
Me campaigning for attorney general: “I’m an anti law judge. If you do crimes that’s great”
1. He likely said this as a contrast to people saying he’s pro-life. So he’s saying “I’m not pro-life, I’m pro-law”. Basically, that he’s not trying to be an activist, just a good judge.
2. The Democratic Party supports people breaking our immigration laws. They turn a blind eye to people who come here illegally and then commit crimes while here. They protest when ICE tries to enforce the law.
So you tell me now that it’s ridiculous for Republicans to post a quote from Kavanaugh saying he’s pro-law.
^^^ Exactly… The fact that this NEEDS to be said, tells you all you need to know about what the Left thinks SC Justices are and do. Remember what Hillary said about HER picks during the election?
“look broadly and widely for people who represent the diversity of our country”
NOT someone who has a long track record of adjudicating on behalf of our laws and Constitution. Nope, needs to be brown and most likely a woman.
“We need a Supreme Court that will stand up on behalf of women’s rights, on behalf of the rights of the LGBT community, that will stand up and say no to Citizens United, a decision that has undermined the election system in our country because of the way it permits dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system.“
NOT the right person with the right experience, a social justice activist. And she better be ready to overturn some stuff…. Jaw dropping if you think about it.. She wants a Justice who will “stand up on behalf and against”. Exactly what Justices SHOULD NEVER DO. They are not appointed to take sides.
“The Heller decision was wrongly decided”
AGAIN, NOT someone who will adjudicate in favor of the Amendments, no, someone to specifically infringe upon them.
And all of this is just icing on the cake when your Dem candidate regularly uses words like “Islamophobia” and “HATE SPEECH”
DEAD give away on how she’d love to see our 1A Rights changed…
I could go on but you see the point.. She wanted a Leftist activist focused of social justice and while you scream like babies about losing your abortions and how “the law is the law”, here’s Clinton purposely picking Justices to overturn Citizens United and Heller, while blatantly telling you what she thinks is acceptable speech… but you’re cool with that, cuz you’re all hypocrites.
Fun fact: During the debates, Clinton mentioned the Constitution ONE time, in reference to pushing Garlen through confirmation hearings… Kind of odd when the ONLY job a Justice has, is to adjudicate whether or not something is Constitutional……
Wide Spread Interests 