keyhollow:

free-lunch-felon:

cisnowflake:

I strongly question the morals of anyone who’s willing to assign guilt to someone based on an accusation alone with absolutely no supporting evidence.

i also question the morals of anyone who’s willing to cast doubt over an alleged victim and undermine her/his credibility if the alleged assailant is famous/rich or a public figure, using the narrative of “she’s probably just doing it for money”

It’s not because of the alleged victim’s status, it’s because of her weird demands, confusing and mismatch stories, witnesses claiming otherwise, and the timing of her coming forward.

In these cases, as mean as it sounds, you’re supposed to doubt the alleged victim to some extent because the accused is innocent until proven otherwise.