by-grace-of-god:

I am just going to say it:
When I see the Church get mixed up in political issues my 1st thought is, “You’re painting the exterior while your house is on fire.”

65-75% doesn’t go to Eucharist regularly. An even greater number have abandoned sacramental Confession. Even though the population goes up, baptisms, confirmations, Catholic marriages, and numbers of priests and religious plummet in the west. Your parishes are emptying out and getting closed. Catholics in NA, SA, and Europe are more likely to identify with secular morality than Catholic morality. Oh…and yeah…you have a rancid cesspool among a minority of your clergy whose fidelity to their vows is akin to a 1980’s cassette player. Your colleges and universities are mostly Catholic in name only, your education systems are in shambles. The devotional life in most catholic households is dead. Your liturgies went from a focus on beauty and the transcendence to a banal broadway play. You wring your hands about youth while you do absolutely anything you can to make us indistinguishable from the secular culture. That leaves us priests on the front lines who are trying to live up to what we said we would do at our ordinations spending too much time explaining the troubles that beset us.

I, and many of the clergy and lay faithful, want the Church to succeed in forming her flock and getting the flock to heaven. We love Christ and His Church. We love our flocks. We mourn the fatal wounds inflicted. We believe that we are to be in the world, but not of the world. We are to be a luminous alternative to the darkness of evil. We have the treasury of God’s grace at our fingertips. Please do something substantial about the problems that inflict the Body of Christ. It is more than new policies and procedures. It is a culture of faith, beauty, and strength.

Fr. Bill Peckman

ChurchFathers.org asks: What did the Fathers say about it?

by-grace-of-god:

A new website gets at the heart of the teachings of Christianity’s earliest preachers and teachers.

It’s little wonder why a Bible-saturated Christian would want to know what men like these had to say about the Christian life. After all, Irenaeus (140-202 AD) was a disciple of Polycarp (69-155 AD), and Polycarp was a disciple of St. John (6-100 AD)—an Apostle of the incarnate Christ and the author of one of the four Gospels.

So…what did they say?

Well, needless to say, a lot. The Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture set has twenty-nine volumes…and that’s just the commentary on Scripture. It’s hard to know where to begin, and wading from start to finish through eight centuries of writing from dozens of scholars—from Ignatius of Antioch to Tertullian to John Chrysostom to Augustine—feels like a very daunting prospect.

Enter ChurchFathers.org…..a refreshingly understated resource cast out for whoever was meant to find it. The sleek, no-frills design offers a direct portal into the teachings of the Church Fathers, one that’s rich with substance but easy to navigate and digest.

ChurchFathers.org asks: What did the Fathers say about it?

I saw that you are the “Patron Saint of Shitposts” and I thought you might be pleased to know that there’s a catholic holy day called Gaudete Sunday, where the priests wear pink robes.

alwaysabeautifullife:

biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

biggest-gaudiest-patronuses:

this can’t be real

update: it’s real

update: it’s the sunday before my human birthday

Oh no y’all they discovered our secret

patron-saint-of-smart-asses:

archer-bro:

deadbilly:

hostile-ghost:

bechdels:

while we’re on the subject of catholicism…

And the bone church is still the most Goth thing ever…

Do I want to know where those bones come from?!

In the mid 14th century, during the Black Death, and after the Hussite Wars in the early 15th century, many thousands were buried in the abbey cemetery, so it had to be greatly enlarged.

Around 1400, a Gothic church was built in the center of the cemetery with a vaulted upper level and a lower chapel to be used as an ossuary for the mass graves unearthed during construction, or simply slated for demolition to make room for new burials.

After 1511, the task of exhuming skeletons and stacking their bones in the chapel was given to a half-blind monk of the order.

Between 1703 and 1710, a new entrance was constructed to support
the front wall, which was leaning outward, and the upper chapel was
rebuilt. This work, in the Czech Baroque style, was designed by Jan Santini Aichel.

In 1870, František Rint, a woodcarver, was employed by the Schwarzenberg family to put the bone heaps into order, yielding a macabre result. The signature of Rint, also executed in bone, appears on the wall near the entrance to the chapel.

Essentially it was a popular burial site for wealthy Catholics and they ran out of room. Eastern Europe is wild. [X]

by-grace-of-god:

What about vocations for people who experience same-sex attraction?

“My vocation is clear: I’m called to become a saint. That’s the universal vocation, which is fulfilled in different ways. Some people fulfill that call of becoming holy as priests, religious, or in the married life, but that doesn’t somehow minimize or replace the universal call to become like Christ.

The key here is a problem with a myopic (if understandable) self-focus on “what about me?” To be honest, this sort of self-focus is one of the deep wounds I think is associated with SSA. There is a wounded Narcissism that was certainly something I’ve had to work to overcome. One of the biggest helps for me was when I realized that there are far more single men and women who desire to be married and never will be than there are people with SSA in the world.

The great vocation of us all is seen in Christ’s prayer in Gethsemane: not my will, but thine be done. For some people, that will be seen as a lifetime of self-denial. In some sense, I’ve always seen the call of holiness as a theology of “don’t.” Don’t put myself in the place of the Father. But of course, that “don’t” is in service of the great “yes” of saying, “Thy will be done.”

The Catechism has this which is a rich vocation to redemptive suffering: “These persons are called to fulfill God’s will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord’s Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.”

That’s a source of great joy.”

– Daniel Mattson, author of Why I Don’t Call Myself Gay

My family’s Catholic but, I’m a Non-Denomonational Protestant. I was batized as a baby by having water poured over my head. However, I’ve been feeling like having an immersion baptism where I’m entirely underwater. Should I? Would it be getting baptized twice?

catholic-chloe-valens:

that-catholic-shinobi:

under-the-arch:

that-catholic-shinobi:

worshipmoment:

Yes you should get baptized.  And no its not a second baptism, I believe if you get baptized it would actually be your first time getting baptized. Why? . Because Infant baptism is not a Biblical practice. An infant cannot place his or her faith in Christ. An infant cannot make a conscious decision to obey Christ. Therefore sprinkling water onto an infant is not baptism. 

If you have more question or you just don’t understand I will explain it more in a upcoming post which will be called (What does the Bible say about infant baptism?)  

BTW I am very happy you have been thinking about getting baptized.  I really encourage it, if you are serious about Christ.  I will be praying for you. God Bless.

Catholics believe, and most Protestants I believe , believe in original sin. Baptism is nessesary for the removal of original sin. It counts as a baptism, however it must be ratified as an adult – which is Why Catholics renew our baptismal vows every year and at Confirmation.

Infant Baptism became a practice because at the beginning converts were baptized as families, but as children became born into the faith there became a concern for their souls since infant mortality was a pretty big thing. Thus, babies were baptized to let them be reborn in Christ and then they could choose to be in the faith or not when they got over.

Thats just a Catholic perspective.

AFAIK, the Protestant view on Baptism is that it is an outward sign of your salvation? IDK how to phrase it. Like, if Baptism was enough to remove and forgive your sins then Jesus wouldn’t be necessary? You get Baptized after you are saved. As an act of obedience to God, and sometimes as a public declaration of your commitment to God. 

Baptism is just original sin only (and sins up to that point if you’re an adult). Otherwise confession is nessesary.

I grew up Protestant and was baptized when I was about 6. A lot of Protestant denominations place importance on the baptize-ee making a conscious choice in the matter (my church was this way); the person has to say yes to Jesus themselves first (and sometimes recite the sinner’s prayer, which is asking Jesus to come into your heart and be your Lord and Saviour). There’s a lot of difference between denominations as to which ones consider baptism to be an actual sacrament vs. an outward symbol of an inward truth.

As far as the Catholic Church is concerned, Protestant baptisms are considered valid and sacramental if they are done explicitly in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (this practice is rooted in Scripture, where Jesus gives the great commission- Matthew 28:19). However, Protestant denominations all have their own varied beliefs about Catholic infant baptism. It would depend on what each individual pastor’s interpretation of Scripture is.

Now (since I can’t resist), doesn’t the Protestant side of the Church seem rather fractured in all of this when it comes to “correct” teachings and interpretations? Ask three Protestants from three different denominations about what baptism really is and you’ll see what I mean. But Jesus Himself, just hours before He knew He was to die for our sins, prayed to the Father asking that the whole Church “be one; even as you, Father, are in me, and I in you, that they also may be in us, so that the world may believe that you have sent me” (John 17:21). The Catholic Church is unique among all Christians in that it is the ONLY branch of Christianity that is officially and completely united in its teachings. Do some Catholics stray from official teachings? Yes, but it is the person who strays while the teachings remained fixed.

I would strongly urge this anon to take all of this into account when comparing their non-denom church to the Catholic Church they grew up in. It seems to me that a lot of people leave the Catholic Church because they do not fully understand her teachings and they have an experiential encounter with Christ somewhere else. Again, as someone who has seen both sides, I GET it. I’ve had certain powerful experiences among my Protestant friends that I have only experienced on very rare occasions in a Catholic setting.

But let me say this. The Catholic Church claims that Jesus actually gives us Himself to consume when we take Holy Communion. The Church claims this is NOT a symbol, but an actual fact. As a former Protestant I can’t help but ask my Protestant brothers and sisters: If there’s even a chance that the Catholic teaching about Communion is true, is it not worth looking into? Because what could possibly be a better experience of Christ than THAT? If you reject this teaching of the Church, I humbly beg you to prayerfully read John’s Gospel, chapter 6 and ask the Holy Spirit to reveal the truth to you. He will, whether I myself am right or wrong.

As someone who has been on both sides, and who is so convinced of the rightness of the Church that I experienced painful rejection from some of my own family members, I urge every Christian to reconsider the Catholic faith. There are answers to every question you could pose concerning doctrine and practices, I promise. It just takes time to seek and find them.

Millennials, Authenticity and the Latin Mass – Crisis Magazine

My wife and I have recently started regularly attending our local Latin Mass in the Extraordinary Form. We took our two young boys one Sunday in July, shortly after the news of ex-Cardinal Theodore McCarrick’s sins jumpstarted the current round of clergy sex scandals. We had previously attended about once a year just to mix it up, but since July we have gone every other week and now three weeks in four. We may switch permanently.

The antiquity of the Mass contrasts with the youth of the congregation. Numerous little children filling the nave provide a background noise of crying, cooing, crawling over pews, and scuffling into laps. These sounds of family life contrast with other parishes where children depart for children’s liturgies or cry rooms, or are simply absent. The adults also present a diverse group. A majority of those present are young families and adults under 50. Although the Catholic Church has hemorrhaged men for decades, men and women are about evenly split here. Nor is it all white people. Despite being a low overall percentage of the local population, a good number of Hispanics are present. Three or four black families and some Asian couples also attend. The congregation more obviously runs the gamut from rich to poor than your typical American parish. “Here,” in Joyce’s mocking but true words, “comes everybody.”

My wife and I are Millennials. Like most of my cohort, I exclusively attended the Novus Ordo in English growing up. My wife converted from Evangelical Protestantism during college. Yet we are poised to join a puzzling trend of modern American Catholicism: the small but growing set of Millennials finding a home in the Mass of Trent.

This confuses our bishops and elders. Catholicism, they say, should make itself more understandable to the modern world. Father Thomas Reese once likened the Mass to new software versions in need of occasional upgrades—like DOS, the Extraordinary Form should be made obsolete. Some think Millennials are revolting against their Baby Boomer parents. Others see Millennials attracted to the mystery of the older form, seeing it as something new and different from their childhood. Many think Millennials have a false nostalgia for a Catholicism that never existed before Vatican II. Still others think this attraction stems from a desire for comfort, security, belief, and the ease with which to avoid the messiness of modernity.

But the young families I have met almost completely lack such pretense. They do not consider themselves better or seek some false comfort. They acknowledge they are sinners living in a sinful world—indeed, that’s what makes them seek out the old rites. They engage the modern world around them, hold down ordinary jobs, cheer for the same sports teams, and spend their weekends doing ordinary modern things. But they share a particular priority: to raise children in twenty-first century America while remaining authentically Catholic.

Millennials and “authenticity” go together. Brand managers speak of a brand being “authentic” to itself or its corporate values to draw in Millennial consumers. Workplace gurus teach older generations how to be “authentic” around Millennials to attract and keep good young employees. Millennials themselves discuss seeking “authenticity” and meaning in their lives and often do so through their choices in consumption, such as by buying locally sourced food produced by old techniques, local craft beer and liquors, handmade products, and “artisanal” goods.

For Millennials, being authentic means that the external, public presentation corresponds to the internal, private reality. Marketers have learned that sales gimmicks simply meant to boost sales only turn off Millennial consumers. Instead, Millennials are loyal to brands that provide social value or utility, or which have a durable quality. Millennials also want the people producing the goods to feel invested in their products and society. This is why farmers’ markets, local butchers, and craft breweries have made a comeback. These people have not “sold out” to big farms or mass-produced meat or bland beer. The product itself comes first, and making the sale is secondary. That personal sacrifice vouches for the goods’ quality and value.

Consider now the Latin Mass. Most priests who celebrate the Extraordinary Form are strong in their faith and ask others to take their Catholicism seriously. They are not “selling” redemption on the cheap. They know (often from their own experience in their dioceses and religious orders) that salvation takes work, effort, and sacrifice. They give you Jesus Christ in his flesh and blood, because that’s why you are there. Everything else is secondary.

But because the external form of the liturgy is secondary to, yet consistent with, the internal Eucharistic reality, it is lifted up into that reality. The chant, the Latin, the repetition, the silence, the incense, the bells—all find their place in glorifying that moment when the priest elevates the Body and Blood. Millennials drawn to the Latin Mass do not see these things as a pretense, but rather as a way to express most fully and consistently the Catholic teaching of the Eucharist.

In other words, Latin Mass Millennials view the liturgy as authentic in a way that the progressive stylings fashionable after Vatican II are not. Yes, Millennials find the Latin Mass mysterious, but in the old sense of mystery, that “revealing” of the true relationship of God and man. It presents order in our messy world—an order that publicly embodies the Faith we privately believe. The Latin Mass presents Catholicism uncompromised by trying to sell itself to the people. It does not try to trick you into thinking it is anything other than what it is.

If I had been allowed an intervention at last month’s Youth Synod, this is what I would have told the gathered bishops: Youth want to know that you, the bishops, believe and embrace the things you teach—that you are authentic. Embracing authentic Catholicism means not trying harder to sell the Faith through new liturgical gimmicks or pastoral compromises. It means presenting the Faith in full and ordering our public lives as faithful, loving, sacrificing Catholics around those internal beliefs. Don’t tell the youth about the Faith, show them. And there is no more beautiful, uplifting, and authentically true way to do so than by a devout presentation of the ancient Latin Mass.

Millennials, Authenticity and the Latin Mass – Crisis Magazine

by-grace-of-god:

“The difference between a Catholic with same-sex attraction and a so-called LGBT Catholic. The latter usually makes several demands: a rainbow flag in the vestibule, a special ’pride’ Mass, and a revision of the Catechism. Those of us trying to deal with our disordered desires – we just get in the line for the confessional along with everyone else.”

Joseph Sciambra   

Homosexuality in Animals and in Human Genes?

by-grace-of-god:

“The challenge was made that since there are “homosexual animals” it “proves” homosexuality is natural. But, given that a few animals seem to demonstrate what might be referred to as homosexual behavior, that in itself, certainly provides no conclusive or foundational basis for the acceptance of homosexual behavior in the human population.

It does not establish homosexual behavior as normal, healthy, desirable or even morally right. Animals can be born with two heads (my friend hatched such a snake a few years ago) and people can be born as Siamese twins, but such aberrations don’t make the condition normal, healthy, or desirable. 

If one replies, as you did, that homosexuality is natural because it is found among animals, then we should notice that there are all sorts of activities practiced by animals that we as humans reject as repulsive. There is extreme cruelty among animals: mothers eating their young, mates eating their partners after mating (e.g., the Black Widow spider), animals eating their own feces and vomit (dogs and cats), or urinating on themselves (goats), etc.

Some animals have mates for a lifetime while others have sex with multiple partners indiscriminately. I could go on and on. What can we draw from these facts? That it is OK for people to practice such things because animals do? Heavens no! Just because animals do things that animals do does not make them our model of morality and accepted behavior.

We are in sad shape if we look to the creatures to search for our origins or to find a model for our behavior. Even worse, if we begin to use animals as our model, we as humans can then justify any deviant behavior since many forms of aberrant and repulsive behavior can be found among the animals that share our planet. 

St. Paul was no fool 2,000 years ago when he wrote …

Keep reading

Homosexuality in Animals and in Human Genes?