Literally why would anybody vote Democrat? For fuck’s sake less than 24 hours after getting small gains in the house the first thing they announce is that they won’t do the one thing most of the people who voted for them really wanted? I mean don’t get me wrong impeaching Trump was a pipe dream that would only be accomplished if they truly managed to pull off that “blue wave“ which I think we all knew wasn’t going to happen, but geez louise you could at least wait a few days before telling your constituents you don’t give a fuck about them.
Also, and I keep coming back to this, what the hell do you think will happen if you impeach Trump? I’ll give you a hint: you won’t magically get a Democratic president. What you’ll get is Mike Pence. All that shit Trump says mostly to get a reaction? Pence means it from the bottom of his heart. I’m quite certain anybody who doesn’t like Trump absolutely doesn’t want Pence.
@libertarirynn I swear you’re the only thing keeping me on this site rn, I just wanted you to know I love you and appreciate your level-headed ass
it genuinely disturbs me to see exactly how many people are drooling over the idea of democrats beating republicans for no reason other than beating republicans. y’all are acting like this is a sports rivalry and its gonna be sO FUNNY TO WATCH THE OTHER TEAM CRY AND SLINK HOME IN DEFEAT AW YEAH
This isn’t a game and this isn’t high school or college, and the fact that you act like it is tells me you don’t actually understand how anything works yet. The candidates you gleefully worship “winning” will most likely not change or improve your life in any way, shape, or form. If you think any politician is going to fix all of your and the world’s problems, you’re out of your mind. It’s more likely they’ll fix absolutely none of them, and that’s IF they don’t actually cause more problems.
You also don’t seem to understand the fact that everything you want has to be worked for in order to obtain it. If you want free healthcare, you’re demanding tons of people work for absolutely nothing. Either that, or you’re demanding that tons of people work for the government, who then steals tons of money from other, lesser-paid people in order to pay the medical industry. I made less than $20,000 this year and I’m likely to forfeit $5k of that to income tax. That’s not counting any other tax. That’s four months of the time I worked. Taxes are already ridiculous and crippling. Why do you think tons of people are out of the workforce and have given up on ever working? Why would you bother when you’re actively punished for working?
If someone wants something, someone has to work to make it or provide it. You can’t just throw one group of average, decent people under the bus to please other average people. It is stealing. Yes, it is morally-wrong to steal from one normal person’s liveliehood to support another person who is unwilling to work, or even try to work.
I find it difficult to believe that nearly a dozen bombs were mailed and not a single one so much as fizzled at any point.
I find it difficult to believe an alleged member of the up-to-now victorious right would commit such an act of political desperation.
I find it difficult to believe that a legitimate act of political terrorism would target irrelevant individuals like Obama, who can’t run again, and Clinton, Holder, or De Niro, who have no political power.
I find it difficult to believe that several packages were sent through the U.S. Mail and none of the leaked pictures show cancellation marks on the stamps.
I find it difficult to believe that the bomb pictures were not deliberately leaked for political gain since we never get to see photographs of the hardware in other terrorist attacks and certainly not the day of the incident.
I find it difficult to believe that, if this was indeed a ‘right-wing terrorist’ attack, that no Republicans were targeted, since the president’s critics are certainly not limited to Democrats (e.g. Senators Flake or Murkowski, Mitt Romney, other Never Trumpers, etc.).
I find it difficult to believe an alleged supporter of the president would jeopardize the winning message of ‘Jobs, Not Mobs’ by engaging in mob tactics.
I find it difficult to believe that the same party that tried to destroy a man’s life with baseless allegations of serial gang rape would not sink so low as to send itself fake bombs to delegitimize the criticism of its own mob tactics.
In other words, I’m not saying the threat is not real or that it did not perhaps originate with some insane supporter of the president, but let’s be frank: there is a lot here that is very difficult to believe and the entire situation is just a little too clean and neatly packaged for media consumption and liberal exploitation.
The republicans seriously posted this unironically
Me campaigning for attorney general: “I’m an anti law judge. If you do crimes that’s great”
1. He likely said this as a contrast to people saying he’s pro-life. So he’s saying “I’m not pro-life, I’m pro-law”. Basically, that he’s not trying to be an activist, just a good judge.
2. The Democratic Party supports people breaking our immigration laws. They turn a blind eye to people who come here illegally and then commit crimes while here. They protest when ICE tries to enforce the law.
So you tell me now that it’s ridiculous for Republicans to post a quote from Kavanaugh saying he’s pro-law.
^^^ Exactly… The fact that this NEEDS to be said, tells you all you need to know about what the Left thinks SC Justices are and do. Remember what Hillary said about HER picks during the election?
“look broadly and widely for people who represent the diversity of our country”
NOT someone who has a long track record of adjudicating on behalf of our laws and Constitution. Nope, needs to be brown and most likely a woman.
“We need a Supreme Court that will stand up on behalf of women’s rights, on behalf of the rights of the LGBT community, that will stand up and say no to Citizens United, a decision that has undermined the election system in our country because of the way it permits dark, unaccountable money to come into our electoral system.“
NOT the right person with the right experience, a social justice activist. And she better be ready to overturn some stuff…. Jaw dropping if you think about it.. She wants a Justice who will “stand up on behalf and against”. Exactly what Justices SHOULD NEVER DO. They are not appointed to take sides.
“The Heller decision was wrongly decided”
AGAIN, NOT someone who will adjudicate in favor of the Amendments, no, someone to specifically infringe upon them.
And all of this is just icing on the cake when your Dem candidate regularly uses words like “Islamophobia” and “HATE SPEECH”
DEAD give away on how she’d love to see our 1A Rights changed…
I could go on but you see the point.. She wanted a Leftist activist focused of social justice and while you scream like babies about losing your abortions and how “the law is the law”, here’s Clinton purposely picking Justices to overturn Citizens United and Heller, while blatantly telling you what she thinks is acceptable speech… but you’re cool with that, cuz you’re all hypocrites.
Fun fact: During the debates, Clinton mentioned the Constitution ONE time, in reference to pushing Garlen through confirmation hearings… Kind of odd when the ONLY job a Justice has, is to adjudicate whether or not something is Constitutional……
Taking the real life, actual story of Anne Frank, the actual human being Anne Frank who was murdered by the nazis for being Jewish, and changing the actual real story of the history of the Holocaust as experienced by Anne Frank to be about non-comparable Current Year events is antisemitism.
Every stupid motherfucker who supports this shit is required to give me 20 dollars
I was a bit sceptical considering the original screenshot looks like it was from Breitbart, where it states:
The production, directed by former Roseanne writer Stan Zimmerman and scheduled to run throughout September, “was inspired by the true story of a Jewish woman in Los Angeles who created a ‘Safe House’ for a Latina mother and her two daughters after her husband was deported by ICE.”
Naturally, my first thought was, “If the play is actually described as the retelling of a true story where a Jewish woman actually did make a safehouse for a Latina mother and her children, maybe it’s the Right-wing media that are being antisemitic and automatically jumping to Anne Frank for no reason?”
This is why it’s important to double-check these things, so I know whether to actually be outraged or not.
The Diary of Anne Frank is being produced by Pop-Up Playhouse in conjunction with Anne Kathryn Parma. Zimmerman’s unique take on the staging was inspired by the true story of a Jewish woman in Los Angeles who created a “Safe House” for a Latina mother and her two daughters after her husband was deported by ICE. Zimmerman states, “This made me think, what would happen if this Jewish woman handed out the play to families that she’s hiding and they all begin to read it aloud? Couldn’t the story of Anne Frank be extremely important today since a recent New York Times’ survey found the memory of the Holocaust is fading?”
No, OP is entirely right and this downright disrespect of Anne Frank’s memory, as well as the memories of everyone else that suffered in the attic, is absolutely abhorrent.
There is absolutely no reason why the play couldn’t be something new, based on that real story about the Jewish woman hiding a family from ICE instead of spitting on the dead and making light of Nazis.
I’m disgusted.
Jfc this is fucking stupid
Jews had lived in Germany, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Austria, etc. for centuries. Their families had owned property. They developed and maintained their own businesses and banks. They were established, having bled, died, and fought for that soil. Their places of worship were destroyed, their citizenship denied, their homeland denied, their rights stripped, and their families torn apart, sometimes literally limb by limb. They were not new immigrants demanding citizenship of a foreign country. They had their very bloodlines infused with European land, it was theirs in every way your property is yours and mine is mine, they had every right to worship and own their property and it was violently revoked from them. Do not compare illegal immigrants to the persecuted Jews of Europe.
This?
This is a nightmare. People were actually rounded up from their own properties and slaughtered like pigs. They were separated from their children and shot into mass graves. There is absolutely nothing about this which you can compare to the crisis of illegals crossing the U.S. border. There is absolutely nothing here which is remotely similar, in any way or any sense. Illegals are not being sought from land they rightfully owned for generations to be slaughtered in death camps.
Shame on all of you who dare to make this comparison. You disgusting people will use any tragedy, even the genocide of millions of human beings, to advance your shit political agendas.
Wide Spread Interests 